CVE-2023-0466

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2023-0466
漏洞归属组件：edk2
漏洞归属的版本：202002,202011,202308
CVSS V3.0分值：
BaseScore：5.3 Medium
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
漏洞简述：
The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented toimplicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificateverification. However the implementation of the function does notenable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrectpolicies to pass the certificate verification.As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it wasdecided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()function.Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificatepolicy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitlyenable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() withthe X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument.Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are notcommonly used by applications.
漏洞公开时间：2023-03-28 23:15:06
漏洞创建时间：2024-02-04 19:26:06
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0466

更多参考(点击展开)

参考来源	参考链接	来源链接
openssl-security.openssl.org	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
openssl-security.openssl.org	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
suse_bugzilla	http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-0466	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
suse_bugzilla	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209873
redhat_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3722	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-0466	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7622	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
redhat_bugzilla	https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7623	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565
ubuntu	https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-0466	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0466	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2023-0466	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-0466	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
debian		https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-0466
oracle		https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/linuxbulletinjul2023.html
gentoo		https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
anolis		https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2023-0466
cve_search		https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72
cve_search		https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
cve_search		https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
cve_search		https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
cve_search		https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
cve_search		https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
cve_search		https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
cve_search		https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
cve_search		http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4
cve_search		https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
mageia		http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2023-0130.html
osv	https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
osv	https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0466
amazon_linux_explore	https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0466	https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2023-0466.html
amazon_linux_explore	https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-0466	https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2023-0466.html
snyk	https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5ab3f71a33cb0140fc29ae9244cd4f8331c2f3a5	https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-UNMANAGED-OPENSSL-5296699
snyk	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565	https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-UNMANAGED-OPENSSL-5296699
snyk	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt	https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-UNMANAGED-OPENSSL-5296699
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
nvd	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
nvd	https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
nvd	https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
nvd	https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
redhat	https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908 (openssl-3.0)	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a (OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable)	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
ubuntu	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
nvd	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
nvd	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
其它
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)

影响的包	修复补丁	来源
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	openssl-security.openssl.org
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	openssl-security.openssl.org
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	openssl-security.openssl.org
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	openssl-security.openssl.org
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	suse_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	suse_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	suse_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	suse_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	redhat_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	redhat_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	redhat_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	redhat_bugzilla
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	osv
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	osv
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	osv
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	osv
	https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5ab3f71a33cb0140fc29ae9244cd4f8331c2f3a5	snyk
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	nvd
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	nvd
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	nvd
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	nvd
	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt	nvd
edk2	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908%20(openssl-3.0)	ubuntu
edk2	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a%20(OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable)	ubuntu
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908 (openssl-3.0)	ubuntu
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a (OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable)	ubuntu
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72	ubuntu
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908	ubuntu
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061	ubuntu
	https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a	ubuntu

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented toimplicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificateverification. However the implementation of the function does notenable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrectpolicies to pass the certificate verification.As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it wasdecided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()function.Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificatepolicy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitlyenable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() withthe X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument.Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are notcommonly used by applications.
openEuler评分：
5.3
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(202002):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(202011):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(202011):受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
8.master(202011):不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(202011):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(202002):否
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(202011):否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(202011):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否

三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接：https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1238

@Bin Wu ,@ZhiGang ,@alexchen ,@Chuan ,@imxcc ,@朱科潜 ,@frankyj915 ,@yezengruan ,@ZhangBo ,@caojinhuahw
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.

影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(202011):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(202002):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(202011):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(202011):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(202011):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(202011):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(202002):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(202011):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(202011):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(202011):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

Hi openMajun_admin, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Virt, and any of the maintainers: @Bin Wu , @ZhiGang , @alexchen , @Chuan , @imxcc , @朱科潜 , @frankyj915 , @yezengruan , @ZhangBo , @caojinhuahw

参考网址	关联pr	状态	补丁链接
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0466
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466	None	None	https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2023-0466
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2023-0466
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-0466

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

@YeXiao 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

@openeuler-sync-bot 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

影响性分析说明：The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented toimplicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificateverification. However the implementation of the function does notenable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrectpolicies to pass the certificate verification.As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it wasdecided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()function.Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificatepolicy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitlyenable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() withthe X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument.Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are notcommonly used by applications.

openEuler评分：
5.3
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(202308):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(202002):受影响
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(202011):受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(202011):受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(202011):受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(202308):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(202002):否
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(202011):否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(202011):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(202011):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):否

@caojinhuahw 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented toimplicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificateverification. However the implementation of the function does notenable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrectpolicies to pass the certificate verification.As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it wasdecided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()function.Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificatepolicy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitlyenable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() withthe X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument.Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are notcommonly used by applications.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.3
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,master:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

@zhanghailiang ,@Bin Wu ,@ZhiGang ,@alexchen ,@王征 ,@imxcc ,@朱科潜 ,@frankyj915 ,@openeuler-sync-bot
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9122T:CVE-2023-0466
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

@zhanghailiang ,@Bin Wu ,@ZhiGang ,@alexchen ,@王征 ,@imxcc ,@朱科潜 ,@frankyj915 ,@openeuler-sync-bot
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9122T:CVE-2023-0466
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

src-openEuler / edk2

内容风险标识

评论 (12)

src-openEuler / edk2 .gitee-modal { width: 500px !important; }

内容风险标识

CVE-2023-0466

评论 (12)

搜索帮助

src-openEuler / edk2